1. What Happened

On May 22, 2026, USCIS issued Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199, directing immigration officers to apply broader discretionary judgment when adjudicating Form I-485 (Application to Register Permanent Residence) petitions. The memo asserts that consular processing abroad is the ordinary route for obtaining permanent residence, while adjustment of status within the United States is a form of discretionary relief.

The agency described this as enabling officers to give greater weight to factors such as criminal history, immigration violations, and prior removal orders—even in cases where applicants are otherwise technically eligible for adjustment of status. USCIS stated that the policy is intended to prevent adjustment of status from becoming a “loophole” and to reduce the risk that applicants denied permanent residence will remain in the United States unlawfully.

2. What the Memo Actually Says — Key Nuances

Two points frequently misreported in early coverage require clarification.

2a. “Extraordinary Circumstances” — Press Release Language, Not Memo Text

Numerous news outlets reported that “an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances.” However, that language comes from a USCIS press release, not from the policy memo itself.

The memo instead instructs officers to exercise discretionary judgment by weighing favorable and unfavorable factors under the totality of the circumstances. It describes adjustment of status as a form of “extraordinary relief” because it allows an applicant to avoid the ordinary consular visa process and obtain lawful permanent residence without leaving the United States. Citing Abdullaeva v. Garland, the memo also emphasizes that the applicant bears the burden of showing that their case merits a favorable exercise of discretion.

This distinction matters because the press release framing may overstate how narrow the new standard is. The actual memo gives officers significant discretionary power rather than prescribing a blanket rule.

2b. No Grandfathering for Pending Cases

USCIS has not announced any grandfathering provision for pending I-485 applications. The new discretionary framework applies to all cases being adjudicated from the effective date forward—including applications already on file. Applicants who filed months or years ago are not shielded from the new policy if their case has not yet been decided.

However, there may be a lower risk for certain categories. Through the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022, Congress provided that I-526E Petitions can be concurrently filed with I-485 Adjustment of Status Applications and that EB-5 visa holders can remain in the U.S. while awaiting adjudication. A USCIS policy memorandum cannot override that statutory protection for EB-5 investors.

3. Who Is Most Affected

Risk exposure varies significantly by visa category and individual circumstances. The table below provides a general framework only—individual cases may differ substantially.

Visa Category Typical Scenario Risk Under New Policy Risk Level
EB-1 / EB-2 NIW Priority workers, self-petition Strongest basis; least affected Low
EB-2 / EB-3 (employer) PERM-based, employer sponsored Minor criminal history or prior removals may surface Moderate
EB-5 Investor Capital investment + I-526 to I-485 Concurrent filing protected under INA §245(n) Low
Family Preference (F-2–F-4) Long waits, older approvals on file Older misrepresentation / unlawful presence may be raised Moderate–High
Immediate Relative (IR) Spouse / child / parent of U.S. citizen Generally protected; prior removals still a factor Low–Moderate
Asylum-based I-485 Granted asylum, then adjusting Officers scrutinizing criminal history more closely High
DACA / TPS + Advance Parole Returned on AP, now adjusting Case-by-case; significant discretionary scrutiny High

4. What to Do Now

If You Have a Pending I-485

If You Have Not Yet Filed

Have Questions About Your I-485?

We are currently scheduling consultations for clients with pending I-485 applications or planning to file. We serve clients in English and Korean.

Schedule a Consultation →

5. Frequently Asked Questions

Does this policy change mean I will be denied even if I am eligible?+
Not necessarily. The new policy increases the weight officers give to discretionary factors, but it does not override legal eligibility. Applicants with clean records and strong positive factors should still receive favorable decisions. The change primarily affects applicants with complicating factors in their history.
My I-485 has been pending for over a year. Does this affect my case?+
Yes, potentially. The new policy applies to cases being adjudicated now, regardless of when they were filed. There is no grandfathering for pending applications. If your case is in adjudication, officers reviewing your file will apply the updated discretionary framework.
I have a minor criminal record from years ago. Should I be worried?+
It depends on the nature and circumstances of the offense. The new policy specifically directs officers to scrutinize criminal history more carefully, but not all records carry the same weight. An experienced immigration attorney can review your specific record and assess the risk to your pending application.
What does “discretionary denial” mean?+
A discretionary denial means USCIS may deny an application even when the applicant technically meets the basic legal requirements. In these cases, the officer decides, based on the overall circumstances, that granting permanent residence is not appropriate. Because this type of decision depends on the officer’s judgment, courts usually give USCIS significant deference, making discretionary denials harder to challenge.
Can I appeal a discretionary denial?+
Yes, in most cases you can appeal to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) or request a Motion to Reopen or Reconsider. However, discretionary denials are difficult to overturn on appeal unless there was a clear legal error. An attorney should evaluate the specific grounds of any denial before deciding on an appeal strategy.
I am a DACA recipient who returned on Advance Parole. How does this affect me?+
DACA-based adjustment of status cases via Advance Parole are among the most fact-specific and sensitive categories under the new policy. USCIS officers have been directed to scrutinize these cases carefully. If you are in this situation, we strongly recommend an attorney consultation before taking any action on your case.
Is H&H Law accepting new clients for I-485 review?+
Yes. We are currently scheduling consultations for clients who have pending I-485 applications or are planning to file. We serve clients in English and Korean. Please contact us at (714) 714-0015 or through our website to schedule a consultation.